Requires Membership to View
To gain access to this and all member only content, please provide the following information:
By submitting your registration information to SearchStorageChannel.com you agree to receive email communications from the TechTarget network of sites, and/or third party content providers that have relationships with TechTarget, based on your topic interests and activity, including updates on new content, event notifications, new site launches and market research surveys. Please verify all information and selections above. You may unsubscribe at any time from one or more of the services you have selected by editing your profile, unsubscribing via email or by contacting us here
- Your use of SearchStorageChannel.com is governed by our Terms of Use
- We designed our Privacy Policy to provide you with important disclosures about how we collect and use your registration and other information. We encourage you to read the Privacy Policy, and to use it to help make informed decisions.
- If you reside outside of the United States, by submitting this registration information you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States.
Lately, we have seen a number of articles covering a newly proposed storage protocol called Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE), which has created a puzzling dilemma for its existence or coexistence in any data center.
The backers of FCoE, who believe in a reincarnation of Fibre Channel protocol, propose that it will be a better choice than iSCSI over 10-Gigabit Ethernet. However, today, most IT professionals who have done their homework properly realize that sticking with pure iSCSI over 10 Gigabit Ethernet makes a lot more sense than throwing another unnecessary protocol in the mix. Why make an existing simple and effective concept more challenging?
Today, 1-Gigabit iSCSI performs well with software based initiator in any modest server. The same can be said about the future of iSCSI when 10-Gigabit Ethernet makes more economic sense to deploy.
But, the same can not be said about FCoE which requires specialized and expensive host bus adapter (HBAs) to properly operate. At least at this point, no FCoE software initiator has been announced by any OS vendors.
FCoE does not make sense. This may be a last ditch effort by Fibre Channel vendors to give their protocol a mid-life kicker.
This was first published in August 2007