Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) overrated storage technology

Digg This!     StumbleUpon     Del.icio.us

RELATED CONTENT IP Storage When should I recommend IP SAN to my customers? What role is iSCSI playing in IP storage, and how does that affect VAR business opportunities? IP storage network bottlenecks Application optimization in IP storage How do I eliminate IP storage network latency? What is the difference between WAN and LAN in IP storage networking? Storage area network (SAN) management: Compliance assessment IP storage can create ongoing revenue supplies Storage area network (SAN) IP protocol options IP SAN storage creates reoccurring revenue for VARs Managed Services Best practices for managing archived data Spotting the next wave of managed services Data storage management software offers solutions Locking down an iSCSI or Fibre Channel SAN IP SAN storage creates reoccurring revenue for VARs IP storage area networks have value with SMBs

RELATED RESOURCES 2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary

Lately, we have seen a number of articles covering a newly proposed storage protocol called Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE), which has created a puzzling dilemma for its existence or coexistence in any data center.

The backers of FCoE, who believe in a reincarnation of Fibre Channel protocol, propose that it will be a better choice than iSCSI over 10-Gigabit Ethernet. However, today, most IT professionals who have done their homework properly realize that sticking with pure iSCSI over 10 Gigabit Ethernet makes a lot more sense than throwing another unnecessary protocol in the mix. Why make an existing simple and effective concept more challenging?

Today, 1-Gigabit iSCSI performs well with software based initiator in any modest server. The same can be said about the future of iSCSI when 10-Gigabit Ethernet makes more economic sense to deploy.

But, the same can not be said about FCoE which requires specialized and expensive host bus adapter (HBAs) to properly operate. At least at this point, no FCoE software initiator has been announced by any OS vendors.

FCoE does not make sense. This may be a last ditch effort by Fibre Channel vendors to give their protocol a mid-life kicker.