How should RAID configuration be determined?

Q: What determines the choice of RAID configuration?

There are three criteria to consider here: performance, reliability/availability and cost. If raw performance is the only concern your customer has and your array supports RAID 1 and 0, then that coupled with 15,000 RPM drives is the way you want to go. However, expect the price tag to be high for this solution. For normal workloads, RAID 5 with 10,000 RPM drives should be sufficient.

Just make sure that you have put in enough spindles to handle the customer's workload, and validate with vendor sizing tools to ensure there are no gotchas after implementation. If you're taking the "cheap disk" approach (that means SATA), then you absolutely want a solution that can handle RAID 6, or something RAID-6-like with a dual-parity schem...

Digg This!     StumbleUpon     Del.icio.us

VIEW ALL IN THIS CATEGORY

RELATED CONTENT Hardware choices Which is the right fit for my customer: NAS, FC SAN or iSCSI SAN? How do I choose the right drive for my customer? Disk Storage Hardware SGI picks up Copan, readies a new spin on MAID; FalconStor, Violin combine on flash SAN accelerator Oracle pledges to advance Sun storage; SolarWinds looks to bring storage admins off the island Finalists: 2009 data storage Products of the Year How to integrate data storage platform software/hardware for DIY storage systems Dataram recruiting for Select level of channel partner program EMC releases FAST for automated tiered storage; Symantec has solid-state drive auto-discovery Pliant claims 180,000 IOPS per drive with new SSDs; Intel to ship 'Nehalem for storage' chips MLC NAND flash gains in enterprise solid-state storage; Fibre Channel switch options for SMBs EMC remakes 8 Gbps FC/10 GbE Clariion; Georgens named CEO of NetApp, says Data Ontap 8 is soon How to improve power efficiency in archive hardware and on primary storage

RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS Terms from Whatis.com − the technology online dictionary Blu-ray  (WhatIs.com)

RELATED RESOURCES 2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary

e to protect from double-disk failures. SATA drives are less reliable than FC drives and are also typically quite a bit bigger. This means that rebuild times will be significantly longer for a 750GB drive than it is for a 146GB drive in a similarly sized RAID group. Since rebuild times are longer, it means you are susceptible to a parity error or a second drive failure that can bring a system down. RAID 6 protects your customer from this issue. The trade-off is that there is additional overhead from the second parity calculation, so you want to take this into account when sizing the solution.

Return to the storage capacity assessment FAQ guide and read the rest of Kurtis' expert responses.