Home > Storage Channel All-in-One Guides > Network-Attached Storage (NAS) Services Guide > Network Storage Solutions > Network-attached storage (NAS) can compete with SAN
All-in-One Guides: Network-Attached Storage (NAS) Services Guide:
EMAIL THIS
 START   TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW   NETWORK STORAGE SOLUTIONS   STORAGE PRODUCTS   NAS BACKUP   STORAGE MANAGEMENT   
Network Storage Solutions

<< PREVIOUS | NEXT >>: Network-attached storage (NAS) purchasing...
COLUMN

Network-attached storage (NAS) can compete with SAN

By Marc Staimer
28 Feb 2006 | SearchStorageChannel.com


Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


Network-attached storage (NAS) is commonly known as a storage networking system for small to midsized businesses (SMBs) -- or even smaller branch and home offices. A storage area network (SAN), on the other hand, is considered the more enterprise-worthy storage networking option, with its scalability, throughput and data protection features.

That's no longer the case.

NAS is still ideal for the SMB market because of its incredible simplicity to install, manage and maintain. However, the NAS products of today go far beyond simple storage.

New technologies and architectures are providing performance that is equal to or better than the best SAN storage arrays. For instance, BlueArc's Titan 2 can demonstrate as much as 300,000 NFS IOPS or approximately 98,000 SpecSFS IOPS per system (600,000 NFS IOPS or 195,000 SpecSFS IOPS per clustered pair) and throughput as high as 1.25 GBps per system (2.5 GBps per clustered pair).

NAS scalability has also come a long way. Three technologies scale both performance and capacity including scale-out software-based clustered file systems, scale-out hardware and software-based clustered file systems, and global name space aggregation (GNS).

Scale out software-based clustered file systems

  • Exanet
  • IBRIX
  • Polyserve (HP sells this as their Enterprise File Services Clustered Gateway)
  • The clustered file system methodology varies by vendor. Exanet and IBRIX both provide the NAS services, as well as the clustered file system. Polyserve provides the clustered file system for standard Microsoft Windows Storage Server 2003 or Linux file servers. Hardware is usually industry standard x86 servers. The software provides near-linear scalability for performance and capacity. Cluster limits are a combination of diminishing marginal returns (when the additional clustered node only marginal increases the scalability because of increased clustered overhead) and testing.

    Scale out hardware and software-based clustered file systems

  • BlueArc (Titan 2 N+1 clustering)
  • Cloverleaf (iSN N+1 clustering available now)
  • Isilon (N=1 clustering available now)
  • NetApp (GX series to be available later this year)
  • The number of units that can be clustered varies by vendor, testing and software clustering overhead, which activates the law of diminishing marginal returns. BlueArc is currently two nodes and will be going to 32. NetApp is currently two nodes and going to eight. Cloverleaf is currently two-to-12 nodes and going to 1,024. Isilon is at 42 nodes and increasing continuously. Hardware is proprietary in the case of BlueArc, Isilon and NetApp, and standard AMD x86 and Solaris architecture in the case of Cloverleaf.

    Global name space aggregation

  • Acopia
  • EMC/Rainfinity
  • Neopath
  • NuView
  • GNS is essential an abstraction layer above the NAS systems it aggregates. The scalability varies by vendor (billions of files for Acopia, tens of millions of files for the others). GNS provides a single image for mounting load balancing and data protection. It allows nondisruptive data migration between NAS systems as well.

    NetApp set the standard for storage data protection simplicity and functionality with their SNAP brand of services. Most NAS vendors and products have responded in kind. In general these data protection services are easier to use, provide more options and have better RPO/RTO granularity than Enterprise SAN storage.

    In my view, NAS has definitely evolved. It's still the simplest storage to implement, operate and manage. Now it has the performance, scalability and data protection equal to or better than enterprise SAN storage as well.

    About the author: Marc Staimer is president and CDS of Dragon Slayer Consulting in Beaverton, Oregon. He is widely known as one of the leading storage market analysts in the network storage and storage management industries. His consulting practice of six plus years provides consulting to the end-user and vendor communities.




    Tags: NAS ManagementNAS HardwareNetwork Storage SolutionsVIEW ALL TAGS

    Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us   


    << PREVIOUS | NEXT >>: Network-attached storage (NAS) purchasing...
    VIEW ALL IN THIS CATEGORY


    RELATED CONTENT
    NAS Management
    MaxiScale out of stealth with Flex clustered file system; Hybir to challenge Mozy and Carbonite
    Reldata focuses unified storage platform on midmarket, channel
    EMC remakes 8 Gbps FC/10 GbE Clariion; Georgens named CEO of NetApp, says Data Ontap 8 is soon
    How to manage EMC, NetApp arrays with Perl scripting
    LSI to go multiprotocol with ONStor buy; Q&A with Quantum's Belluzzo
    A customer's first SAN/NAS is a dangerous install
    NAS filer implementation: Solving three big problems
    New directions for storage networking
    VMware storage protocol decision: Why not NFS?
    How to choose among storage networking protocol options for VMware

    NAS Hardware
    NetApp launches new SME FAS system, lowers price of entry-level box
    Dell looking to expand; HP purchases file-system vendor Ibrix
    Startup Pranah launches with multiprotocol SMB storage system
    HP resizes scale-out NAS system; next-gen archiving
    NAS filer implementation: Solving three big problems
    Sun claims open storage traction; will Oracle approve? VMware vSphere 4's thin provisioning interests admins
    Four reasons to sell network unified storage platforms
    Cisco looks for share of SMB storage market with NAS boxes
    High-performance NAS technology podcast
    How will high-performance NAS changes affect your business model?

    Network Storage Solutions
    Unify network-attached storage (NAS) with file area networking (FAN)
    Reduce network-attached storage (NAS) server sprawl
    Network-attached storage (NAS) purchasing considerations
    Network-attached storage (NAS) device purchasing for SMBs

    RELATED RESOURCES
    2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
    Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
    Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary

    HomeNewsTopicsITKnowledge ExchangeTipsMultimediaWhite PapersBlogsEvents
    About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
    SEARCH 
    TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

    TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




    All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2006 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
      TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts