Home > Storage Channel Tips > Storage Area Network (SAN) > Six reasons why SMBs need iSCSI storage area networks (SANs)
Storage Channel Tips:
EMAIL THIS
 TIPS & NEWSLETTERS TOPICS 

STORAGE AREA NETWORK (SAN)

Six reasons why SMBs need iSCSI storage area networks (SANs)


Jacob Gsoedl, Storage contributor
01.09.2007
Rating: --- (out of 5)


Storage Channel Update
Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google


Cheaper and easier to use than Fibre Channel, iSCSI is considered by many to be the next great storage technology for small to medium-sized businesses. Here are six popular reasons why.
  1. Why should SMBs look at iSCSI vs. Fibre Channel (FC) SANs?
    • iSCSI SANs are less expensive than FC SANs.
    • An iSCSI SAN is based on the familiar and ubiquitous TCP/IP protocol.
    • iSCSI SANs are less complex and easier to manage than FC SANs.

  2. How can iSCSI save you and your customers' money?

    iSCSI uses TCP/IP instead of a proprietary storage protocol such as FC. As a result, iSCSI SANs can be built with commodity network components, eliminating the need for costly FC host bus adapters (HBAs), which are typically priced between $800 and $1,200, and FC switches.

  3. How is iSCSI being used in SMBs vs. large enterprises?

    While SMBs use iSCSI SANs as their primary storage, large enterprises use iSCSI to complement their FC storage for less mission-critical departmental apps, remote offices and data protection. Typical applications for iSCSI are messaging apps like Microsoft Exchange, databases, Web apps, file serving and disk-to-disk backup.

  4. What iSCSI weaknesses should you consider when developing iSCSI services offerings?

    Storage management is one of the weaker aspects of iSCSI. Storage management vendors are just starting to add iSCSI support to their suites. While FC switches are well supported by all major storage management apps, only some aspects of Ethernet switches, like availability, are addressed by storage management suites.

    Security is another controversial aspect: Although FC proponents are quick to point out security concerns with iSCSI, in reality, iSCSI is an inherently more secure protocol than Fibre Channel.

    With the reliability and feature gap closed, the slower performance of iSCSI is now the primary technical argument FC advocates use for not considering iSCSI for enterprise-level applications. But iSCSI speeds are beginning to catch up with FC, and the two protocols are on a leap-frog path with each one boasting new product releases that bests the other, but not for very long. However, the FC protocol has a slightly lower latency than TCP/IP.

  5. Why iSCSI, why now?

    One could argue that the popularity of NAS was the main reason for the ever-increasing interest in iSCSI. NAS dependency on higher level file-system protocols (CIFS/NFS) makes NAS less suitable for block-based transactional applications like databases; as a result, NAS vendors are adding iSCSI support to their offerings. Because NAS and iSCSI are both based on TCP/IP, iSCSI is a more natural SAN supplement than FC in NAS environments.

    Furthermore, the number of innovations and companies developing for the TCP/IP and iSCSI space today greatly surpasses the number of FC developments. Besides 10GigE, network packet processors--from companies like Broadcom Corp. and Cavium Networks--for ...


    Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google



    RELATED CONTENT
    iSCSI SAN IP Storage
    Reldata focuses unified storage platform on midmarket, channel
    NetApp and Emulex prep cloud storage push; FalconStor enters storage hardware market with its NSS HC
    Startup Pranah launches with multiprotocol SMB storage system
    iSCSI adoption rates among storage buyers
    Dell launches PS6000 iSCSI SANs; slow-restore claims on Quantum VTL
    Storage area network (SAN) cheat sheet
    Nexsan launches first iSCSI SAN product
    Four reasons to sell network unified storage platforms
    Our top five storage tips -- so far
    iSCSI Study Guide

    Storage Area Network (SAN) Design and Planning
    A customer's first SAN/NAS is a dangerous install
    Storage area network (SAN) cheat sheet
    Storage architecture choices: SANs
    Key considerations in developing a storage area network design
    iSCSI Study Guide
    iSCSI Study Guide Answer Key
    Maximize data center space with SANs
    IP SAN services fertile ground for SMBs
    Pop quiz: Storage area networks (SANs)
    iSCSI storage vs. Fibre Channel storage: A SAN tutorial

    Storage Area Network (SAN)
    Infrastructure consolidation projects: FCoE and backbone implementation
    How to become an FCoE expert: Technology landscape, in-depth training
    Steps to FCoE readiness
    How to prepare customers for Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE)
    How to manage EMC, NetApp arrays with Perl scripting
    A customer's first SAN/NAS is a dangerous install
    Four reasons to sell network unified storage platforms
    How to choose among storage networking protocol options for VMware
    iSCSI, FCoE or InfiniBand for storage networking?
    Our top five storage tips -- so far

    RELATED RESOURCES
    2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
    Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
    Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary


    packet inspection, prioritization, encryption, compression and TCP optimization are the building blocks for next-generation TCP/IP and iSCSI products.

  6. Will iSCSI push FC out of the data center?

    There's no doubt iSCSI will dominate the SMB storage space and will be the preferred storage option for workgroup servers and, eventually, corporate desktops. What's still unclear is if iSCSI can push FC out of the enterprise data center. With FC's large installed base, long-standing support for mission-critical apps and the availability of 8Gb/sec FC, it's the preferred technology for most large data center storage. For a transition to happen, it will take large storage vendors like EMC, HP and IBM to recommend iSCSI over FC, which is unlikely to happen in the near future.

Find the rest of Gsoedl's article on Developing iSCSI SAN solutions for SMBs on SearchStorageChannel.com.

Rate this Tip
To rate tips, you must be a member of SearchStorageChannel.com.
Register now to start rating these tips. Log in if you are already a member.




DISCLAIMER: Our Tips Exchange is a forum for you to share technical advice and expertise with your peers and to learn from other enterprise IT professionals. TechTarget provides the infrastructure to facilitate this sharing of information. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the material submitted. You agree that your use of the Ask The Expert services and your reliance on any questions, answers, information or other materials received through this Web site is at your own risk.

HomeNewsTopicsITKnowledge ExchangeTipsMultimediaWhite PapersBlogsEvents
About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
SEARCH 
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2006 - 2009, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts